When a member of staff calls in sick, the immediate cost can seem relatively straightforward: arranging cover, adjusting timetables and managing short-term disruption.
But the true cost of sickness absence is often far greater.
For schools and trusts, absence can create a ripple effect across budgets, leadership capacity, workforce wellbeing, recruitment and retention, and ultimately pupil outcomes. Viewed through a strategic lens at trust level and sickness absence is more than an HR issue. It is a risk to the whole organisation.
Recent data from the Department for Education shows that more than 322,000 teachers took sickness absence during the 2024/25 academic year, resulting in over 2.6 million working days lost across schools in England.
The question for school leaders goes beyond how to manage absence, but whether they fully understand what it is costing their organisation.
The visible costs are just the beginning
The financial impact of sickness absence is often the easiest cost to identify.
Schools may need to:
- Arrange supply cover
- Reallocate workloads
- Pay overtime or additional hours
- Divert leadership and business support resources
Yet these direct costs are only part of the picture.
According to the Office for National Statistics, UK workers lost an estimated 148.8 million working days due to sickness or injury in 2025, equivalent to an average of 4.4 days per worker.
For schools already operating within tight budgets, even relatively small increases in absence can create significant operational pressure.
The hidden cost: leadership time
One of the most overlooked impacts of sickness absence is the time it consumes from senior leaders.
Each absence can trigger a chain of activity:
- Cover arrangements
- Welfare conversations
- Return-to-work meetings
- Occupational health referrals
- Attendance monitoring
- Formal capability or absence procedures
While these activities are necessary, they divert valuable leadership attention away from school improvement priorities.
For MATs, the challenge is often multiplied across multiple settings, making consistency and effective oversight increasingly difficult.
When absence becomes a symptom of wider workforce pressures
Perhaps the most significant strategic risk is that absence can indicate deeper organisational challenges.
Research from Education Support's latest Teacher Wellbeing Index found that:
- 76% of education staff report experiencing stress
- 77% experience symptoms of poor mental health due to work
- 36% are at risk of probable clinical depression
- 86% of senior leaders report feeling stressed
The report describes teacher wellbeing as being at "crisis point", highlighting the close relationship between wellbeing, retention and organisational performance.
In other words, sickness absence is often not the problem itself. It is the visible outcome of issues such as workload pressures, burnout, organisational culture, employee relations challenges or insufficient wellbeing support.
The retention connection
Schools cannot view sickness absence in isolation from recruitment and retention.
The latest wellbeing research suggests workforce sustainability remains a growing concern, with 61% of school staff saying they do not plan to remain in the profession long term.
Meanwhile, workload continues to be a key pressure point, with 71% of respondents describing their workload as unmanageable.
When absence levels increase:
- Existing staff absorb additional work
- Pressure on remaining employees grows
- Stress levels rise
- Retention risks increase
This can create a cycle that becomes increasingly difficult for schools to break.
What does good absence management look like?
While organisations cannot eliminate sickness absence entirely, they can reduce its impact by taking a proactive and strategic approach. This includes:
Strong attendance monitoring - using accurate data to identify absence trends before they become embedded.
Early intervention - addressing concerns promptly through supportive conversations and wellbeing-focused interventions.
Manager capability - ensuring leaders are confident in conducting return-to-work meetings, managing attendance concerns and recognising warning signs.
Occupational health support - providing access to specialist advice where underlying health conditions may be affecting attendance.
Focus on wellbeing - building a culture that supports employee wellbeing and addresses workplace factors contributing to absence.
Looking beyond absence rates
The most effective organisations do not simply measure how many days have been lost, they ask wider questions:
- Why are employees absent?
- Are certain patterns emerging?
- Which teams are most affected?
- What pressures are driving attendance concerns?
- What are the implications for retention and organisational performance?
Answering these questions allows schools and trusts to move from reactive absence management towards proactive workforce planning.
How Judicium Education HR Can Help
Managing sickness absence effectively requires a balance of compliance, consistency and compassion.
Judicium Education HR supports schools and trusts with:
- Attendance management advice
- Complex and long-term absence casework
- Occupational health referrals
- Policy reviews and development
- Employee wellbeing strategies
- Manager training and support
- Employee relations guidance
By combining practical HR expertise with a strategic understanding of the education sector, we help leaders address not only the symptoms of absence, but the underlying causes.
Final thought
Sickness absence will always be part of workforce management. But when millions of teacher working days are lost each year, the issue deserves attention beyond simple attendance figures.
For schools and trusts, the real question is not "How many people are absent?" It's "What is absence telling us about our organisation, and what is it costing if we fail to act?"
You can contact us at employmentlawadvice@judicium.com and you can find information regarding our Employment Law and HR service here.
Follow us on Twitter: @JudiciumEDU.
