Safeguarding FAQs: Ask the Experts

5th November 2026

Sofa Sessions Safeguarding

Share this post:

 
Safeguarding FAQs: Ask the Experts

This blog summarises the key insights and discussions from the Safeguarding Sofa Session, Safeguarding FAQs: Ask the Experts.

A sneak preview of what our panel of Safeguarding experts will be discussing at our Annual Safeguarding conference and the answers to the questions submitted by our webinar registrants. From professional curiosity and family context to SEND, safeguarding assurance and audit culture, read the practical insights on some of the biggest safeguarding challenges facing schools and trusts today.

Understanding Family Context and Professional Curiosity

While schools often have access to indicators such as attendance, behaviour and wellbeing, these only provide part of the picture. A child's experiences are shaped by the wider context of their family life, including the role of caregivers, adversity and the challenges families may be facing behind the scenes. Understanding these influences is vital to building a complete picture of a child's needs, experiences and potential vulnerabilities.

A key focus of this session is the importance of professional curiosity and how practitioners can develop a deeper understanding of a child's lived experience without making assumptions or jumping to conclusions. However, building that understanding is not always straightforward. Time pressures, limited information sharing and the trust-based relationships schools work hard to establish with families can all create barriers to gathering a complete picture.

Practitioners are encouraged to reflect on how they gather information, challenge assumptions and balance supportive relationships with the need to ask difficult questions when concerns arise. Ultimately, understanding family context is fundamental to identifying risk, recognising vulnerability and ensuring children receive the right support at the right time.


Why is understanding family context so important, and what makes it difficult to remain curious while maintaining trust?

Understanding family context is fundamental to effective safeguarding because schools only ever see part of a child's lived experience. By looking beyond attendance, behaviour and wellbeing indicators, practitioners can build a fuller picture of the experiences, relationships and circumstances that may be influencing a child. However, maintaining professional curiosity is not always straightforward. Strong relationships with families are vital, but time pressures, incomplete information, difficulties accessing information from other agencies and familiarity with families can all make it harder to ask the questions needed to fully understand a child's circumstances.

What can practitioners do to remain professionally curious while maintaining trust with families?

Building positive relationships with families and maintaining professional curiosity should not be seen as opposing priorities. Practitioners should feel confident asking respectful but challenging questions when concerns arise, while remaining open-minded and avoiding assumptions. A key principle is to distinguish between what is known, what is assumed and what is being hypothesised. Seeking information from multiple sources, reflecting on existing beliefs and continually testing understanding can help professionals build a more accurate picture of a child's lived experience while preserving trust and partnership with families.


What can schools do about challenges in multi-agency working?

Schools should make their voices heard through local safeguarding partnerships and formal feedback processes where information sharing is not working effectively. Making full use of the latest information-sharing guidance can also help strengthen collaborative safeguarding practices, improve communication between agencies and support more effective decision-making for children and families.


    EYFS Safeguarding: Avoiding Assumptions and Hidden Compliance Risks

      Safeguarding in the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) comes with its own unique requirements and responsibilities, yet these can sometimes be overlooked within wider school safeguarding arrangements. Reception classes are often seen simply as another part of the school, but EYFS provision is governed by specific safeguarding and welfare requirements that require careful oversight.

      A recurring challenge is the assumption that processes are being managed elsewhere. Whether it's staff qualifications, supervision arrangements, paediatric first aid provision or adult-to-child ratios, vulnerabilities can emerge when schools rely on assumptions rather than regular review and scrutiny. Even seemingly minor staffing changes during the school day can have implications for compliance and pupil safety.

      Leaders should regularly challenge assumptions, review practice and ensure EYFS-specific requirements remain firmly on the safeguarding agenda. A proactive approach helps identify gaps early, strengthens compliance and provides assurance that safeguarding arrangements are meeting the needs of the youngest children in a school's care. 


      Why can safeguarding risks be missed in EYFS settings?

      Safeguarding risks can sometimes be missed because schools assume someone else has already checked that requirements are being met. Reception classes are often viewed as simply another year group within the school, but EYFS settings operate under a distinct set of safeguarding and welfare requirements. Assumptions around staffing, qualifications, supervision and first aid provision can create compliance gaps that may go unnoticed until problems arise.

      What are the most common assumptions schools make about EYFS safeguarding?

      One of the most common assumptions is that established whole-school safeguarding arrangements automatically cover EYFS requirements. However, leaders need to be confident that staffing ratios, qualification requirements, paediatric first aid cover and supervision arrangements remain compliant at all times, particularly when staff are absent or redeployed elsewhere during the school day.

      If a school is compliant with KCSIE, does that mean it is compliant with EYFS safeguarding requirements? 

      While Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) provides the foundation for safeguarding practice across schools, it does not replace the specific safeguarding and welfare requirements outlined in the EYFS framework. Schools should ensure both frameworks are reflected in their policies, procedures and day-to-day practice rather than assuming compliance with one guarantees compliance with the other.

      How can leaders strengthen safeguarding oversight in EYFS?

      Regular review is essential. Leaders should routinely check staffing structures, qualifications, first aid provision, supervision arrangements and broader safeguarding processes to ensure they continue to meet EYFS requirements. Clear accountability and ongoing monitoring can help identify issues before they become risks, giving schools greater confidence that safeguarding arrangements remain effective and compliant.


      SEND, Online Safety and Challenging Assumptions

      Children and young people with SEND often experience the online world differently. Digital spaces can provide connection, friendship, belonging and opportunities for self-expression, particularly for those who may find face-to-face interactions more challenging. However, these same factors can increase vulnerability to online harm, exploitation and manipulation. Safeguarding approaches therefore need to balance protection with empowerment, ensuring children can benefit from online opportunities while developing the skills needed to navigate risks safely.

      Another important consideration is the risk of assumptions. Changes in behaviour, communication, attendance or wellbeing can sometimes be attributed solely to a child's diagnosis, potentially masking underlying safeguarding concerns. Given the increased vulnerability of many children with SEND, it is important that professionals remain curious, understand each child's baseline presentation and explore changes with an open mind rather than making assumptions.

      A child-centred approach requires schools to adapt safeguarding practice to individual needs, ensuring pupils can access online safety education, communicate concerns effectively and have their voices heard in ways that work for them. Building this understanding helps professionals identify risks earlier and provide more effective support.


      How can schools balance online safety with opportunity for children with SEND?

      Online spaces can offer friendship, community and a sense of belonging for children with SEND, but they can also present additional risks. Rather than focusing solely on restricting access, schools should help children develop the knowledge, confidence and skills needed to recognise and respond to online harm safely. Building resilience is just as important as implementing safeguards.

      How should online safety education be adapted for pupils with SEND?

      Online safety education should be tailored to meet individual communication and learning needs. Approaches such as visual supports, social stories, role play, repetition and simplified language can help make key messages more accessible and meaningful. The aim is to ensure pupils not only receive the information, but understand how to apply it in real-world situations.

      How can schools avoid attributing safeguarding concerns solely to a SEND diagnosis?

      Professionals should start by understanding what is typical for an individual child and remain alert to any changes from that baseline. Changes in behaviour, presentation or wellbeing should not automatically be explained by a diagnosis. Instead, practitioners should gather information from multiple sources, consider alternative explanations and remain open to the possibility of safeguarding concerns.

      What should schools make of children describing AI chatbots as friends?

      Rather than focusing solely on the technology itself, professionals should be curious about the role these interactions are playing in a child's life. If a child views an AI chatbot as a friend, it may provide insight into needs relating to connection, acceptance, reassurance or belonging. Understanding why these relationships are meaningful can help schools better support a child's wider wellbeing.

      How can schools ensure the voice of non-speaking children is heard?

      Every child has a voice, although they may communicate it in different ways. Schools should utilise communication aids, alternative communication methods and tailored support to ensure children can express their views, wishes and concerns. Establishing these communication pathways before concerns arise can make it easier for children to access help and support when they need it most.


      Safeguarding Assurance: Moving Beyond Compliance and Towards Confidence

      Safeguarding assurance has become an increasingly important area of focus for trusts and school leaders. While individual schools are often focused on day-to-day safeguarding activity, trust leaders need a broader view, understanding how safeguarding is working across multiple settings, identifying patterns and ensuring consistent practice. Effective assurance is not about collecting more information, but about having confidence that safeguarding arrangements are making a meaningful difference to children and young people.

      Policies, procedures and training records all provide important evidence, but they only tell part of the story. Gaining assurance requires leaders to understand how safeguarding is experienced across their organisation, where risks may be emerging and whether systems are achieving the intended outcomes. This means looking beyond compliance and focusing on impact, culture and continuous improvement.

      Strong safeguarding assurance also enables leaders and governors to challenge effectively, identify inconsistencies and make informed decisions. By gathering meaningful intelligence rather than simply collecting data, trusts can develop a clearer understanding of strengths, areas for development and the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements across all their schools.


      How do trusts know they are receiving the right safeguarding information?

      The focus should be on gathering information that helps leaders answer strategic questions rather than accumulating large amounts of data. Information should help identify trends, understand risk, evaluate interventions and provide assurance that safeguarding arrangements are operating effectively. The key is not how much information is collected, but whether it provides meaningful insight that supports decision-making and improvement.

      What does meaningful safeguarding assurance look like

      Meaningful assurance goes beyond checking policies, training records and statutory requirements. It should enable leaders to understand how safeguarding works in practice, whether procedures are being implemented consistently and whether children are receiving the support they need. Effective assurance combines quantitative information with qualitative intelligence to provide a more complete picture of safeguarding across an organisation.

      What role do governors and trustees play in safeguarding assurance?

      Governors and trustees play a vital role in providing strategic challenge and oversight. To do this effectively, they need an understanding of safeguarding that goes beyond compliance and enables them to ask informed questions about culture, vulnerabilities, outcomes and emerging risks. Governance-specific safeguarding training can help strengthen confidence and ensure challenge is both constructive and effective.

      Why is stakeholder voice so important when seeking assurance?

      Feedback from staff, pupils and parents can help leaders test assumptions and understand whether safeguarding arrangements are working as intended. Listening to the experiences of those directly affected by safeguarding policies and practices often provides insights that cannot be captured through reports and metrics alone. Incorporating stakeholder voice helps build a more accurate and balanced picture of safeguarding effectiveness.

      How can trusts move from operational oversight to strategic safeguarding leadership?

      Strategic safeguarding leadership requires leaders to look beyond individual incidents and focus on patterns, themes and long-term improvement. By using information to understand risk, challenge inconsistencies and evaluate impact, trusts can move from simply monitoring safeguarding activity to providing genuine assurance that children are safe, supported and able to thrive.


        Safeguarding Audits: Looking Beyond Compliance to Understand Culture

        Safeguarding audits are often viewed as a compliance exercise, but they can offer much deeper insights into how safeguarding is experienced across a school community. While policies, procedures and records provide important evidence, they do not always reveal whether safeguarding is fully embedded in everyday practice. Understanding how safeguarding is understood by staff, experienced by pupils and perceived by families can provide a much richer picture of a school's safeguarding culture.

        A strong safeguarding culture is built on more than documentation. It requires leaders to understand whether staff know how to respond to concerns, whether pupils feel confident seeking help and whether safeguarding messages are consistently understood across the school. Audits can help challenge assumptions, identify gaps between policy and practice and highlight areas where further support may be needed.

        Regular review and reflection can also help schools identify emerging risks, strengthen accountability and ensure safeguarding remains a whole-school responsibility rather than the sole responsibility of the designated safeguarding lead. By seeking feedback from a range of stakeholders and evaluating how safeguarding operates in practice, schools can gain confidence that their arrangements are effective and responsive to the needs of children and young people.


        What can safeguarding audits tell us beyond compliance?

        Safeguarding audits provide insight into how safeguarding operates in practice, not just whether the right documents are in place. They can help leaders understand whether staff are confident in their responsibilities, whether pupils know where to go for support and whether safeguarding processes are being applied consistently across the school. Audits therefore offer valuable insight into a school's overall safeguarding culture and effectiveness.

        Where should schools focus when testing their assumptions?

        Schools should look beyond leadership perceptions and seek feedback from pupils, staff, governors and parents. Comparing these different perspectives can help identify gaps between what leaders believe is happening and what stakeholders actually experience. This process of triangulation provides a more accurate picture of safeguarding practice and can uncover issues that may otherwise go unnoticed.

        How can schools ensure pupil voice is represented effectively?

        Gathering pupil voice should go beyond speaking to a small group of student representatives. Schools should seek input from a broad and diverse range of pupils to understand how safe they feel, whether they know how to report concerns and how safeguarding support is experienced across different groups. This can help ensure improvement activities are informed by the experiences of the children they are designed to protect.

        How can audits support inspection readiness and continuous improvement?

        Audits can help schools identify strengths, prioritise areas for development and test whether safeguarding arrangements are working effectively before external scrutiny. Particular attention should be given to vulnerable groups, children missing education and pupils accessing alternative provision. Used effectively, audits provide a valuable opportunity for continuous improvement rather than simply preparing for inspection.

        Why should safeguarding responsibility extend beyond the DSL?

        While designated safeguarding leads play a crucial role, effective safeguarding relies on shared ownership across the organisation. Strong systems, clear accountability and a culture of collective responsibility help ensure safeguarding remains effective even when key individuals are absent. Embedding safeguarding across leadership teams, governance structures and the wider workforce creates a more sustainable and resilient safeguarding culture.


        Effective safeguarding relies on looking beyond the information immediately in front of us. Whether considering family circumstances, EYFS provision, SEND, safeguarding assurance or audit activity, professionals must be willing to challenge assumptions, seek different perspectives and build a fuller picture of children's experiences. Doing so helps schools and trusts move beyond compliance, strengthen professional judgement and create cultures where safeguarding is embedded across the whole organisation.

        These themes represent just a snapshot of the challenges and opportunities facing safeguarding leaders today. At our Annual Safeguarding Virtual Conference, each of these topics will be explored in greater depth, providing practical guidance, expert insight and actionable strategies to help schools and trusts strengthen safeguarding practice across their settings.

        How Judicium Can Help...

        Judicium Education’s Safeguarding Service is designed to support schools and academy trusts to meet Ofsted and statutory requirements and prepare for the upcoming KCSIE updates.

        From annual safeguarding audits and unlimited advisory service to our Jedu online compliance dashboard where you can track progress and access resources, our comprehensive service is designed to strengthen your safeguarding strategy and create a safe and supportive environment for pupils and staff alike.

        You can find information regarding our Safeguarding services here.

        If you would like to talk to someone about some support for your school or trust, do not hesitate to call us on 0345 548 7000 or email enquiries@Judicium.com

        You can follow us on X: @JudiciumSG   @JudiciumEDU

        © This content is the exclusive property of Judicium Education. The works are intended to provide an overview of the sofa session you attend and/or to be a learning aid to assist you and your school. However, any redistribution or reproduction of part or all of the contents in any form is prohibited. You may not, except with our express written permission, distribute or exploit the content. Failure to follow this guidance may result in Judicium preventing you from accessing our sessions and/or follow-up content.

        Related content

        Fire Safety Failures: What Recent Audits are Revealing

        4th November 2026 | Sofa Sessions | H&S and Fire

        Fire Safety Failures: What Recent Audits are Revealing

        Our latest blog focuses on common findings from recent health and safety audits and fire risk assessments, along with practical steps schools can take to strengthen their fire safety arrangements. 

        Read full article →

        When Concerns Keep Rumbling: Neglect, Thresholds and Professional Challenge

        21st October 2026 | Sofa Sessions | Safeguarding

        When Concerns Keep Rumbling: Neglect, Thresholds and Professional Challenge

        Neglect should be focused on the child's lived experiences. Read further insights in our latest blog on neglect.

        Read full article →

        Benedict’s Law in Force: Closing the Compliance Gaps in Allergy Safety

        14th October 2026 | Sofa Sessions

        Benedict’s Law in Force: Closing the Compliance Gaps in Allergy Safety

        Benedict's Law is now in force, but what challenges are schools and trusts facing now? Read our latest blog.

        Read full article →